
Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die.
Alison Krause
Within a family of churches whose modern obsession has been adding new people to the church membership rolls, discipleship has taken a back seat to conversion.
Jesus was famously uninterested in adding converts. At the end of three and one-half years of ministry, he had a net gain of eleven disciples. When great masses of people gathered around to join his movement, he all but ran them off (see, for example, John 6:115). Individuals who approached him wanting to secure a spot in his movement were severely challenged as to their intentions and commitment.
For Jesus, a convert required “conversion”a real and material change from one world to another, from one set of allegiances to another. There are many textual examples of Jesus encountering this problem, a problem that persists to this very day.
Of all Jesus’ stern rebukes to would-be disciples, none has captured my imagination as strongly as the three, recorded in quick succession, in Luke 9:5762. Here, Luke has condensed for his readers a sampling of the kind of interest Jesus’ ministry attracted. People were regularly drawn to him. Sometimes it was his powerful and courageous words aimed at the status quo. Sometimes it was his miraculous acts. Sometimes his deep compassion. These three archetypes, if you will, had prior commitmentsall three wanted discipleship to fit in neatly with his lifeto neatly conform to prior commitments. Jesus brushed them aside in a way that seems almost harsh.
The vitally important context for these three would-be disciples is a single sentence that serves as a hinge in Luke’s narrative: “When the days drew near for him to be taken up, he set his face to go to Jerusalem” (9:51).
This paradigmatic “journey to Jerusalem” takes almost half of Luke. The reader knows that this journey will not end well for Jesus. He was going Jerusalem to face rejection, condemnation, and death as a political criminal. The expression “set his face” tells more than just what Jesus’ itinerary was. It says something about his determination and focus. He was on a mission and he would not be deterred.
If we back up to get a bit of the story leading up to verse 51, we notice that even before the journey to Jerusalem got started there was trouble. In typical fashion, the disciples were found, in verse 46, to be arguing over who was the greatest. It seems, once again, the disciples had gotten their own personal ambitions mixed up with the purposes of God.
Any time God’s ministry is being carried forwardpeople are being healed, the kingdom of God is being proclaimedsome ambitious person wants the credit or the glory. This was certainly true in Jesus’ day and it remains the case today. Any time God is getting something done, there are would-be disciples who get their own personal ambitions mixed up with the purposes of God. Part of following Jesus, as a faithful disciple, is being aware of our personal ambitions and learning to lay them down and follow Jesus. After all, this isn’t a nature walkwe are headed to Jerusalem.
Coming back to our three would-be disciples, we are again confronted by Jesus’ seemingly strange response. I confess being surprised by Jesus.
I picture myself being approached by these “seekers,” who say, “we want to come with you where you’re going.” Of course, I would encourage them. Perhaps I would give them Bible studies, pray with them, mentor them, and help them join the church.
Not Jesus. His outreach tactics were, well a little more severe. The first person approached Jesus and wanted to join in the journey, but Jesus flatly discouraged him. “We’re essentially homeless,” he told him. “You might want to reconsider. Even wild animals have a place to call home a place to sleep at night. But not uswe have nowhere to lay our heads. If you want to come with us those are the terms.”
The second would-be disciple wanted to follow Jesus, but after he gave his father a proper funeral. That seems like a reasonable request. Jesus response appears coldhearted“let the dead bury the dead.” A third man wanted to follow Jesus, but only after saying goodbye to his family. Jesus would have none of it: “No one who puts their hand to the plow and looks back is worthy of me.”
I want to protest, “Wow, those are some high standards, Jesus! It’s not very ‘seeker sensitive of you.’ I mean, how do you expect to build a significant following when you’re so hard to please? Couldn’t you at least lead with the benefits? Maybe then you could throw in the downside.” But it’s almost like he didn’t want people to join his mission.
In conversation with a friend many years ago, both of us wrestling with the issues of evangelism and discipleship in our respective churches, we wondered how this teaching of Jesus would go over in today’s church environment. The contemporary church, of which Adventism is a part, is very concernedone could even say anxiousabout numerical growth. Pastors, will do almost anything, it seems, to make the teachings of Jesus palatable so that more people will join our churches.
My friend mused that, whereas we are prone to preach sermons like, “Ten Ways Being a Christian Will Improve Your Life,” Jesus was far more prone to preach sermons like, “Ten Ways Following Me Will Mess Up Your Life.” He repeatedly advised them to consider what Dietrich Bonhoeffer dubbed, “the cost of discipleship.” Why is it that we shy away from speaking clearly about this “cost?”
Instead of following Jesus’ example, the contemporary church has been so eager for converts that we have taught for generations that Jesus can fit in with your life and your plans. In fact, the church has even taught that Jesus’ purpose is to make your life work to make you successful and happy. Yet I don’t find that anywhere in Scripture. To the contrary, those who came to Jesus with those expectations and conditions were discouraged from following him.
Clearly we are not Jesus. We don’t know what brings people to curiosity about Jesus. Personally, I think I will always be one to nurture people along the path of discipleship. I don’t think this text is a license to discourage people from being disciples. But neither are we licensed to offer people something other than the gospel. Our message is not that people can “have Jesus in their life,” as the church has often said. Nowhere does the Bible teach that we can have Jesus as a part of our lives. With Jesus, there is no middle ground. You either follow or you don’t.
Don’t go looking over your shoulder, either. Jesus uses an illustration that doesn’t mean much to us urbanites, but if you’re plowing a row and look over your shoulder to see how you’ve done, even if the row has been perfectly straight up to that point, you start wandering all over the place. You cannot follow Jesus while looking over your shoulder. And you can’t follow Jesus with your list of expectations.
So, let’s be clearJesus wants disciples. Jesus loved his disciples, John tells us, to the very end. He staked his kingdom on these twelve crazy guys and the dozens of other women and men who clustered around him. But there are several lessons about discipleship that Luke wants us to get in this story.
Ryan Bell is senior pastor of the Hollywood, California, Seventh-day Adventist Church.
Comments
"Nowhere does the Bible teach that we can have Jesus as a part of our lives. With Jesus, there is no middle ground. You either follow or you don’t."
That statement requires more explanation. Define what it means to follow. And how is that quantified or qualified? Is it in "doing" certain things? What are the requirements for being a follower?
In the story of Luke, we have very few examples of how they were able to support the 13 plus people that were his immediate group. Did they not have to be self-supporting, something that all of us must do? How does one change his life today in ways that can be observed? Or is it an inner conviction to do what each of us can do to help those in need? Is there more: an additional task required of us rather than generalities? Doesn't being a Christian require the highest integrity in all that we do? Shouldn't that be the criteria, being the best in our profession or vocation? That would seem to be the best witness we could possibly give.
The lesson for this week is actually a potentially troubling one I think. My first reaction to Ryan Bell’s title was more along the lines of “10 Ways you must already BE messed up -- if You are to qualify as a Disciple.” I mean think about it: you must be homeless, (no place to lay your head) penniless, (give ALL you have to the poor) have NO family -- because you’ve abandoned them. (if anyone comes to me and doesn’t hate his father and mother) By those criterion, Christ has almost NO disciples today. I certainly qualify on NONE of these requirements.
I confess that this comment from the essay, “Jesus was famously uninterested in adding converts.” made little sense to me considering that awkward command by Jesus to “Go and MAKE disciples in ALL the nations.” Yes, the very one which causes so much guilt among so many.
All in all a good essay though and one which I hope to use in class this week.
We might ponder together, in addition to this, Christ's insistence that his burden was easy and his yoke light... and that he came that we might have life "more abundantly"... All a matter of perspective I guess.
Thanks Ryan.
I must confess after reading the commentary I felt a little discouraged. Mr. Bell's five points are a little daunting (to me). In my private practice I can be straight forward and rigid with clients but am I helping people in the long run? My experience with people has taught me that we must be nurtured (and nurturing) if we are to survive in this world and ultimately draw people to God. Perhaps Jesus' goal while on this earth was not to gather followers but something different.
Dave Chamberlain M.Ed.
AASECT Certified Sex Counselor
Many of the stories in the gospels seem to be about how to become a disciple. I am reminded of the scene in a movie where the main character tries to convert to Judaism. He arrives at the rabbi's office, only to have the door slammed in his face. What all Jews know, and most movie goers don't, is that in Jewish practice, a goy (non-Jew) who wishes to convert should be required to ask three times. That separates the frivolous from the serious. There are also many stories in Hindu, Sufi, Buddhist lore that tell a similar story: the guru tests the would-be student to see his level of interest and commitment. So these stories about Jesus are as much designed to show him as a genuine reb as to show the way to discipleship. A real Jewish teacher who did not test his disciples would not be respected.
The REAL test for a goyim wishing to convert to Judaism: circumcision is mandated! That denotes seriousness.
In a world and a culture where Christ is seldom the center of attention, I would think that anyone who even has a mild interest in Christ and his message would qualify for a disciple or a disciple-in-training.
If you make too many requirements of potential disciples, you might wind up with the original 11 disciples some future day. You would then have to start from scratch again and rebuild what the past 2,000 years have brought about.
Is it the demands of Jesus the reason why the church is full on Sabbath morning and virtually empty on Sabbath afternoon, Sunday evening and on Wednesday?
Think of it. the economy, social obligations and the family.
God have mercy.
Luke 9:57 The man (actually, a scribe-Matt 8:19) is Judas (Desire of Ages pg.293) who gets rebuked with Jesus' words about not having a place to lay his head. Jesus pointedly addressed his particular vice of avarice and ambition (Desire of Ages, Chapter "Judas" pg.716). He wasn't deterred, so Jesus did accept him and later included him as one "chosen" in John 6:70 "Did I Myself not choose you, the twelve, and yet one of you is the devil?".(I love this tension of acceptance, while knowing the heart!)
So, it may be a stretch to take Jesus' rebuke to a particular would-be disciples and generalize that these three were the required costs for everyone. Nicodemus and Matthew also had means that weren't addressed by him as a prerequisite.
And certainly- hating one's family has to be within the context of Jesus' caring for his mom at the cross as well as denying them authority to order him around when they came to the conclusion he was crazy. And His call to the four fishermen was just AFTER he gave them and their dad full nets of fishes to handle their family's needs- anyone considerate enough to give at least 6 month's wages in advance, is pretty shrewd and responsible.
Cost of discipleship? supremacy that risks everything else. So, whatever is our biggest fear-stemming from our biggest vice, that may be exactly where Christ wants us to go with Him. And that will be OUR individual calling to follow.
Thanks Ryan - those last 5 points are worth printing out and taping to my desk to remind me that the reality of discipleship is rarely reflected accurately in stained glass windows.
Elaine,
"To be the best that we can be" may be a pop-psychology mantra for a successful life, but has nothing to do with Christianity or with "following Christ". We, as Adventists, have been saturated with the idea of being "witnesses" to the world around us, while forgetting that to be a "witness" means you need to have "witnessed" (by personal experience) something yourself.
The disciples followed Jesus around and were present when he died and, later, when he was resurrected - and had something to report. At the end of the story, Jesus told his disciples to go into all the world and "witness" WHAT THEY HAD PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED. Our modern translation of that: "go make more SDAs by quoting a few texts and singing a few songs". By the same token, being a "nice guy" has nothing to do with having experienced Christ. As you have pointed out in the past, non-Christians and atheists can be nice too. Isn't there something more to being a Cristian?
Well, as I recall, Love is the one command that we have been given: it incorporates all the others. The imperative about "witnessing" is a frequently-used term that has multiple interpretations. The best witness is a conscientious life lived for helping others. Telling someone about your particular religious beliefs is not called for and should not be done unless it is specifically requested. Silent witnesses are the best. "Actions speak louder than words."
Ryan: You stated that Jesus, "At the end of three and one-half years of ministry, ... had a net gain of eleven disciples."
Did you forget the five hundred to whom Jesus appeared after the resurrection? And how about all those who did believe in Jesus but, like Nicodemus, had not yet mustered the courage to do this openly?
Likewise, three thousand joined the nascent Christian church following a single sermon preached by Peter. Would you credit Peter with three thousand converts as a result of one evangelistic sermon, while arguing that after three and a half years of preaching Jesus had merely twelve converts?
This reminds me of Elijah's experience who complained to God that he was the only individual who had remained faithful to the Lord, and God had to reveal to him that he had seven thousand Israelites who had not bent their knees in front of Baal!
Post new comment