Peace-making in Palestine


Treye & Janelle with a Palestinian child

Treye McKinney and Janelle McIntyre* are two extraordinary young people committed to non-violence through active engagement with the needs of Palestinians in the West Bank. Together they served at the Palestinian Aida Refugee Camp in Bethlehem from February 2008 through March 2009. Treye has also volunteered with Christian Peacemaker Teams and has participated in various protests against the unjust treatment of Palestinians and the Israeli violence in Gaza.

Question: Treye, you mention on your blog biography that the way you experienced violence as a child directed your journey into active pacifism. Can you talk about that a little? What other texts and models have helped shape your philosophy?

Treye: Yes, the physical abuse I witnessed and experienced as a child actively influenced and still influences my pacifism. I don't believe my past experiences were the deciding factor in convincing me of the truth of pacifism, but they were an influence; now that I have accepted pacifism as a belief and way of life, my childhood memories give my beliefs a personal side. They are not just heady theories. Perhaps the greatest lesson I learned from my childhood was that responding to violence with violence never helps or improves any situation: it only exacerbates and escalates it.

I have not always been a pacifist. Growing up, my father was physically abusive. When I was about 15, I decided that I would not tolerate violence from my father anymore, so I started fighting back to "defend" myself, my brother, and my mother. The situation at home went from bad to worse, and eventually I realized that one of us, either my father or I, was literally going to kill the other person. Someone had to leave. At 16 I left home and haven't spent much time there since. It takes time to heal from years of observing and receiving violence, and it wasn't until I was 21 that I was really able to ponder the question of pacifism and nonviolence.

The greatest influence on my decision to become a pacifist was my reading of the New Testament and Jesus’ words and example of love and nonviolence. Other influential figures for me were Tolstoy, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr., but all of these characters cited the New Testament as the basis for much (if not all) of their pacifism. There are few clearer exhortations than "Love your enemies" and few stronger examples of applied pacifism than Jesus' and the early church's example of turning the cheek--refusing to fight back against the Romans and others, even at the risk of their lives and the lives of those they loved. The Sermon on the Mount has always haunted me, and I happened to be reading this text around the time of 9/11/01. The US response to the attacks struck me as blatantly contradicting Jesus’ words, and that sent me on a personal quest to develop my own beliefs about war and violence.

It was several years before I finally took the stand as a pacifist, but after I made the decision, peace work seemed to find me. I remember the evening when I became a pacifist. Previously I had supported nonviolence, but believed that there were times when it might be necessary to use violence on behalf of the oppressed. A college professor asked me, "Would you want someone to violently liberate you from an oppressor?" "No," I answered. "So then why would you do that for someone else? If God is the defender of the oppressed, let Him do that. Don't do the job for him." These words deeply impacted me, and from that point forward, I fully embraced pacifism.

After this decision, I went on to organize a club and many different antiwar activities on the Walla Walla College campus to raise awareness about violence in our society and nation. After college, I volunteered with at-risk school children and the homeless for several years, while also continuing to work and protest against much of US international policy.

Question: Violence and injustice are a reality in many parts of the world. Why the interest in Palestine/Israel?

Treye: As I watched the run-up to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq several years ago, I realized that these wars were really symptoms of an utterly failed half-century long US foreign policy in the Middle East. At the heart of this was America's blind support for Israeli policy, regardless of its effect on other local populations. If there could be a peace between Palestinians and Israelis, this would likely result in Israel making peace with the rest of its Arab neighbors. And if the US could be seen as a more equal-handed force in the region, then there would be much more peace in the world in general. Right now, Israel is the largest recipient of American aid dollars (mostly military), and the Palestinians are the largest and longest running refugee crisis in the world. Finding a just peace for Palestinians and Israelis would greatly impact other conflicts in the Middle East, both current and future.

I have wanted to live in Palestine since about 2003, so having the opportunity to spend a year there recently was a dream come true. The Palestinian situation is personal to me, as Palestinians are caught in a cycle of violence similar, in some ways, to my own story. My father was physically abused by his father, and although my dad swore never to repeat his father's mistakes, he did continue them. On a much larger scale, Jews received persecution for hundreds of years in Europe, and after the Holocaust, they swore never to allow that type of persecution to happen again. However, Jews in the state of Israel are now repeating many of their oppressor’s mistakes by persecuting the Palestinians. To really break free from these cycles of violence, a person or group must say, "Enough! I will not continue the violence, regardless of the cost. I will not respond to antagonism, violence, or aggression with my own violence. The buck stops here. I want to be governed by love, not hatred."

Janelle: I came to Palestine to complete the Field Practicum portion of my Masters in Public Health, Global Health, from Loma Linda University. I chose this region because of my interest in social justice and how it relates to overall health. The Israeli presence and current political situation significantly affects the health of Palestinians. Many social, economic, and political barriers affect the access Palestinians have to health care.

Question: Treye, you participated in quite a few Palestinian protests during your time overseas. What happened at some of those protests? Why did you decide to abandon them?

Treye: What I witnessed at Palestinian protests (anti-Wall, anti-Occupation) greatly disturbed me. There is propaganda on both sides of this dispute, and one of the pieces of propaganda coming from some Palestinians is that the protests are completely peaceful and nonviolent. While the Palestinian demonstrations are not as lethal as Israeli responses (with soldiers carrying M-16s, body armor, and supported by tanks and fighter jets), the protesters display much anger and hatred. Rock throwing, which can also be very dangerous, is a traditional part of most demonstrations. The situation is very much a David vs. Goliath scenario, only the giant is better armed and protected than the original giant, while David is still slinging rocks with slingshots.

While I think I understand why some Palestinians are angry and resort to violence, as a nonviolent pacifist I do not support responding to any situation or person with violence or hatred. Ultimately, I had to withdraw my support of the protests.

Question: Both of you worked at the Aida Palestinian Refugee Camp in Bethlehem, West Bank. What kinds of people did you work with there? How do residents arrive at the camp and for how long do they stay? Where do they go when they leave?

Treye: I went to Aida Camp to teach computer skills and English to children in grades 2-9. Refugees at Aida, like most other Palestinian refugees, fled to the camp in 1948 because of violence and pressure from Jewish militias that helped establish the modern state of Israel. Altogether, there are about 7 million Palestinian refugees (total Palestinian population is about 10 million), coming mostly from two wars: the war for the establishment of Israel in 1948 and the Six-Day War in 1967 (when Israel conquered the West Bank).

Because unemployment is extremely high in the camps (70-80%), most Palestinian refugees never leave them. There are now several generations of refugees that have all lived "temporarily" in camps supported by the United Nations. Once in a while, a person or family manages to save enough money to move away from the camp, and usually when this happens, they move into a city in Palestine or overseas (many Palestinians, if given the choice, would chose not to live in Palestine because of the violence and oppression).

Janelle: Treye and I also volunteered at the Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center, a local community center serving the 4,000 residents of Aida, 66% of whom are under the age of 18. Al-Rowwad supports drama, traditional dabka dance, and choral music.

Question: Janelle, together with another volunteer you started the Health and Environmental Education Activities Program (THEEAP) for children at Aida. What sorts of activities does THEEAP provide for Aida residents?

Janelle: As Program Coordinator for the Environmental & Health Unit at Al-Rowwad, I helped develop and implement THEEAP for 50 Aida camp children. Prior to this, there was no structured health or environmental education program for children.

THEEAP is a 12-week program providing children with daily workshops and drama, craft, and physical activities. It teaches oral health, nutrition, physical fitness and environmental awareness. For example, to teach kids about recycling we have them make crafts out of discarded materials they can find around the camp. We also coordinate presenters for women’s fitness classes and facilitate nutritional classes, weight-loss and oral-health workshops, focus groups, kids educational and recreational field trips, and more.

Question: What was the health condition of the children you worked with?

Janelle: Children in the camp suffer from problems related to bad oral hygiene, lack of nutrition, and obesity. Their seemingly endless consumption of candy is a major contributor to these problems. Even though candy is more expensive than healthy food such as fruit, a local mother explained that kids buy sweets as a status symbol: as soon as they get any money they spend it on sweets.

Another issue is the lack of safe space for kids to be physically active. There are no parks near the camp, and the Israeli Wall separates children from the olive groves in which they used to play. Even though most families are very poor, every household has at least one television. Because it can be dangerous for children to play in the streets, most girls are not allowed to. They stay inside watching Arabic soap operas and music videos.

In July another volunteer and I were finally able to take 28 out of the 50 children that participated in THEEAP to a nearby dental clinic run by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). Prior to our first visit, it took six weeks for three Palestinian women (who work in health fields) to determine from UNRWA that it could give the children free cleanings.

I was amazed that people from the Aida Refugee Camp (for whom the clinic is specifically designed to help) did not know they could get their teeth cleaned for free. It is true that the clinic is severely understaffed, but my coworker and I had no problem taking the children each morning. None of the 50 children in our program had attended the clinic before, and the 15 women in our focus group had never taken their children for a dental check-up or cleaning.

Question: What is the future of THEEAP?

Janelle: Due to a lack of funding, volunteers, and local initiative (which is the basis of sustainability), THEEAP has not continued in its ideal form. But it has been simplified to deal with these constraints. Last fall, the second session of THEEAP incorporated graduates from the first session as “student teachers,” who performed a drama on the importance of oral health.

Question: How do you see humanitarian service as integral to the work of peacemaking?

Treye: Humanitarian service is a basic component of peacemaking because there are certain things people need in order to survive and act human. When people are deprived of their basic necessities (such as the people of Gaza, who have been suffering from a severe Israeli blockade against humanitarian supplies), they lash out like animals. They become desperate to regain dignity, respect, and the elements needed for survival.

When people have their basic needs met, however, they are much less likely to resort to violence in order to solve problems. It is usually only in periods of calm and health that people can reflect upon the questions of violence and peacemaking. In my own personal situation, I could not reflect properly about peacemaking until I had spent several years away from the violent situation in which I was raised. Only then could I make a mature decision to follow a different path. People need to have their basic needs met before they can really step outside of the cycle of violence and live differently.

Question: You inspired a good following where you both studied at Walla Walla College. But Walla Walla is a conservative Adventist school, and your passion for Palestine undermines the “traditional,” one-sided, rigid Christian support for the state of Israel. How do you see younger generations of Christians responding to the ideal of non-violence, especially in Israel/Palestine?

Treye: There is some hope that younger Christians will one day realize that the support of Israel's violent policies is not only bad for Palestinians, but also extremely damaging for Jews around the world. These policies actually threaten the future existence of Israel.

There is a possibility that the Christian support for Israel will start to change slightly in the coming years. However, I do not see much hope for today's Christians returning to the nonviolent pacifism of their past, exemplified by Jesus and the first Christians. Christian history is wrought with violence, and I fear it will continue to be such. There will always be a few people in various religions who believe in and are committed to nonviolent pacifism, but I do not see that tradition becoming popular in mainstream Christianity again.

Question: Treye, you spend active time each day in private meditation and prayer. How does this prepare you for the work of peace-making?

Treye: My private meditation and prayer is the bed-rock of my peace work. Without it, I do not think I would have become or stayed a pacifist. The time I spend each day seeking the Spirit prepares me for life's frustrations.

For me, nonviolence is not just about the absence of war or fighting, but about continually preparing myself to respond to each person and situation with love and nonviolence. I do not consider myself to be a nonviolent person (nonviolence is not something one fully attains, but a lifestyle one attempts). I try to be nonviolent, and by continuously seeking the Spirit, I pray that I can live a life of peace, pacifism, and patience.

Question: What about when non-violence doesn’t bring about change? How do you see efforts for non-violence working and not working for Palestinians?

Treye: For me, nonviolence is not foremost about bringing change. I am not nonviolent because I want to manipulate a situation; nonviolence is not a tactic, but a way of life. I am nonviolent because I have to be, because it is the right thing, what God requires.

We pray that nonviolence will change things, and that above all, the situation will not be worsened because of nonviolence. To my knowledge, there is no significant nonviolent movement in Palestine at the moment. But there are individuals and small groups that act nonviolently.

I think nonviolence could be quite effective in the current situation because Israel is very concerned with its international image. If Israel was seen by the rest of the world to be abusing nonviolent Palestinians on a regular basis, it could threaten Israel's ongoing occupation of Palestine. However, much work will have to be done in Palestine before the masses adopt nonviolence. Their struggle is one for dignity and freedom, and it is very difficult for an oppressed people to react nonviolently to their oppressors. We continue to pray that there will be a change of heart on both sides, that all people will realize the futility of violence and embrace the more peaceful way of coexistence.

Question: Early Adventism preached pacifism and encouraged its church members in the military to enlist as conscientious objectors. How do you see modern Adventism relating to its non-violent heritage?

Treye: I do not see much in modern Adventism relating to its nonviolent roots. To be a legitimate prophetic voice, Adventism needs to reclaim this struggle for nonviolence. Adventism was originally not only nonviolent, but also anti-American imperialism. But today, modern Adventism supports both the military and many of America's imperialistic tendencies.

Question: Treye, your last blog entry states that you return from Palestine less idealistic, less hopeful for the situation in the Middle East, and with less belief in the ability of humans to do good. This is depressing. What hope is left for those longing for peace and wholeness in our battered world?

Treye: Yes, I am depressed about the situation in Israel and Palestine, and I do not have much hope that the conflict will be resolved quickly or easily. Peace work is slow, frustrating work, and we cannot concentrate only on seeing results.

I suppose that I will continue trudging on with peace work at some level or another, not because I believe I will always see results, but because God has called us to be peacemakers. Jesus said that the poor will always be with us, but he didn't add to that, "So, don't help the poor." Instead, he spent all his time helping them. Similarly, Jesus said that in the end there will be wars, but that he and we should spend our time loving our enemies, praying for them, and working against all forces that plant seeds of destruction.

Treye McKinney graduated from Walla Walla College in 2004 with majors in Theology and English. His blog can be accessed at www.palestine-delegation.blogspot.com.

Janelle McIntyre* graduated from Walla Walla College in 2004 and completed her Masters in Public Health at Loma Linda University in 2008.

*Janelle McIntyre is a pseudonym.

Comments

Yet again another great interview, and of two of my favorite people! Janelle also helped me start the extremely successful Amnesty International chapter at Walla Walla, and was pivotal in its future success as a key component of getting it done.

I'll have to ask Janelle her opinion of your question, "Early Adventism preached pacifism and encouraged its church members in the military to enlist as conscientious objectors. How do you see modern Adventism relating to its non-violent heritage?" since I would find both Treye and Janelle's fascinating, seeing how their work in Palestine has re-worked their views.

Your mission and passion are most admirable.

You said:

"Would you want someone to violently liberate you from an oppressor?" "No," I answered. "So then why would you do that for someone else? If God is the defender of the oppressed, let Him do that. Don't do the job for him."

Would that also apply to your child, your loved ones who were being oppressed? Should the Allies in WW II by violence at times, liberate the remaining Holocaust victims? What should pacifists have done then?

The Nonviolence of Jesus and the early Church was radical, and even in the face of personal death or the death of loved ones, the early Christians did not fight back. There is not one example, for three hundred years, of early Christians fighting back against persecution, and the reason: because Jesus said to love your enemies.

Jesus's words meant that Christians should not treat their enemies any different from their friends or loved ones ("What credit is it to you if you love those who love you? Even sinners do that").

In personal cases, such as Ms. Nelson cited, I would hope to find means other than killing to aid my loved ones. One of Gandhi's grandsons said to me once, "The idea of nonviolence is to try to do the least violent thing." Many situations are difficult, but pacifism resists easy answers, instead challenging people to be creative in the way they react to a situation. For me, the black and white is that I hope I would never take someone's life, regardless of the circumstance. However, there are many other ways to react, and, above all, I would never sit by and do nothing.

In an example like WWII, there are many things pacifists could have done before the point of war (i.e., standing against US and intl corporations that enabled the arms build up to war--even selling arms to the Nazis). But, I like what Gandhi said when asked whether his methods would work against Hitler: he responded that in war, there are always casualties, and if his methods (nonviolence) were applied against Hitler, there would be casualties as well. However, Gandhi believed that pacifism could defeat Nazism. Even with the violent response of the Allies, millions of people lost their lives, and I imagine a pacifist response would have been no different in regards to major loss of life. However, the major differences with a pacifist response is that it maintains the moral highroad, challenging people to be better than war and hatred. The fallout from the Allies victory in WWII was the arms race, Cold War, nuclear proliferation, etc., whereas the results of a peaceful victory over something like Nazism would be much different.

In the face of great destruction like that of WWII, there is no good answer, and likely millions of people will die. For me, the important thing is to maintain sanity and humanity in the face of violence and say, "I will not lower myself to that level and respond to violence with violence, regardless of the consequences. I will love through this, and love will be victorious."

Thank you both of you for a thoughtful and informative interview about your work there.

I'm so very proud of my students -- interviewer and interviewee! Thanks for being prophetic voices. Well done good and faithful servants.
blessings

I find this article to be very one-sided. God loves all people, including Jews and Palestinians. But Hamas has engaged in far more than rock throwing. It has repeatedly and without provocation fired rockets at civilian population centers in Israel. And it was the people of Gaza who voted this despicable terrorist organization into power. Why is this kind of violence against the Jewish people not mentioned? I attach no prophetic significance to the Jewish state, but I do believe that the Jews deserve a homeland as a refuge from persecution, and I consider this article to be borderline anti-semitic. If people turn their backs on Israel, there could be another Holocaust in store for the Jewish people.

The only real solution to the conflict between Jews and Palestinians is found in the gospel of Jesus Christ. Although both of these people groups are highly resistant toward the gospel, it has been conclusively demonstrated that when Jews and Palestinians do embrace Christ as a personal Savior and accept His free grace, they also embrace each other as brothers and sisters.

We would be living in a very different world today if German agression in both the WW1 & WW2 had not been stopped and extreme pacifisym would not have a have stopped the Kaiser's armies or Nazi armies and we would all now be speaking German or Japanese. During the Jewish Biblical Exodus God slew all the first born of Egypt including the first born cattle and at the crossing of the Red Sea He drowned the Egyptian army. Then when Israel came into the promised land they were instructed to destroy the Caananite inhabitants, men, women and children. None of these acts could be construed as pacifist

If the Palestinians would stop attacking the Israelies the Israelies would leave them alone. Israel has never responded to a non provoked attack.

In an ideal world there would be no violence but this side of the kingdom we live in a more pragmatic system.

I agree with Bob that the Jewish people have a right to live in peace and security, and I would not support displacing them or moving the state of Israel. However, if we want to prevent a second Holocaust from happening to the Jewish people, we should also be against a similar violence and persecution of Palestinians as well. I do not believe Israel needs to exist in order for Jews to live without persecution (the state of New York is testament enough to this).

The reason rockets are not mentioned in this article is that 1) I was not asked about them in the interview (although I wrote plenty on my blog in strong opposition to this kind of terrorism), and 2) because I had no direct or personal experience with the rockets, rocket launchers, or anything to that effect. However, it would follow that if I am opposed to Palestinians throwing rocks, I would also be opposed to Palestinians throwing rockets (which have the potential to be much more lethal).

The Israeli reaction to Palestinian rocks or rockets is a complete overreaction and ignores the part Israel plays in provoking the Palestinians. Palestinian rockets, although terrorism, do not often hit any target: compare the number of Israelis killed in the last Gaza invasion (13, including Israeli soldiers) with the number of Palestinians (over 1300). If we're going to call Palestinian rockets “terrorism” for killing innocent civilians, then we should also call Israeli rockets “terrorism” for killing many more civilians.

To say (as Bob and Allen do) that Israel only reacts to Palestinians without provoking them is not only one sided, but it ignores history and buys into Israel's propaganda of only being the victims in the conflict. These arguments ignore the fact that Israel, since the beginning of its modern existence, has: repeatedly stolen land from Palestinians and continues to do so; forces Palestinians from their homes and does not allow them to return (aka ethnic cleansing); conducts nightly military raids in the West Bank, abducting Palestinians and holding them for years without charges; kills at least 4 Palestinian civilians for every 1 Israeli civilian killed; builds Israeli settlements on Palestinian land, attempting to make a 2 state solution impossible; etc., etc.

Bob mentioned that he felt some tones of anti-Semitism in the interview. I assume he meant anti-Israeli or anti-Jewishness because Arabs are also Semitic. I am not, of course, anti-Jewish—I believe many of Israel’s policies are very bad for Jewish people all around the world (i.e., the aggressive and abusive Israeli policies put all Jews at risk, unfortunately).

I find comments about Palestinians and Israelis not having peace until they accept Christianity to be either culturally or religiously elitist. Christians have warred and killed just as many people, if not more, than other religions. These kinds of statements ignore how modern a conflict this is, and how major a role the US plays in supporting Israel (not to mention the fact that a significant portion of Palestinians are, actually, Christian). Jews and Muslims (even in Palestine) have a history spanning centuries of relative peace and coexistence. I don’t think Jesus would deny a people living a peaceful life merely because of their religion or who they voted for, and neither should we.

Although it is true, as Allen points out, that the writers of the Old Testament claimed that God sanctioned violence there, it is also true that many of the stories in the Jewish Scriptures are not God’s ideal. I believe Jesus came to change, among other things, the hatred, warring, nationalism, and killing demonstrated in the Old Testament (i.e., You’ve heard . . . Hate your enemies, but I say, Love them). In stark contrast to the Jewish Scriptures and traditions, there is not a single example of lethal violence used by humans in the New Testament, and this tradition lasted in Christianity for 300 years.

We don’t know what would have happened if the world would have used nonviolent resistance against the likes of Hitler. As I already said, I am not a pacifist because I think it will “work” in every situation, but there are many examples of nonviolent resistance working (Gandhi kicked the British out of India, the Civil Rights movement in the US, and Denmark resisting Hitler, to name a few). I recommend the series “A Force More Powerful” in book or video form to see many examples of nonviolence “working” (see http://www.aforcemorepowerful.org/films/afmp/stories/denmark.php for the example of Denmark resisting the Nazis).

However, I firmly believe that if we only see nonviolence as a tactic and use it when we think it will work, we lose the whole point of nonviolence: seeing that of God within each person and refusing to hate and kill one another.

Post new comment

Because conversation is our mission, we publish all comments immediately. We simply request that you focus on the posted topic, and not attack anyone or use profanity. Please sign your post. Consistently used pseudonyms are acceptable, but "anonymous" is not. Adding links to commercial web pages for promotional purposes is not allowed. A link to your personal blog is welcome. This site is a place for thoughtful conversation and a healthy exchange of ideas and perspective; rants and tirades don't further this mission and are not appropriate. We reserve the right to delete comments which do not follow these guidelines. Thank You!
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comments are limited to a maximum of 5000 characters.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

User login