NARLA: Why we must reject extreme interrogation

20 December 2007

NARLA: Why we must reject extreme interrogation

By Alexander Carpenter
in
image: 
torture.jpg

Religious liberty is an important value to Seventh-day Adventists. But beyond being free to keep the Sabbath, the necessary protections for conscience and human freedom don't always get official or lay attention.

In this video cast, James Standish, of the NAD's North American Religious Liberty Association gives three quick reasons that Adventists should reject extreme interrogation tactics.


Click here to learn about Adventist-supported national religious liberty legislation.

Comments

Post new comment

Because conversation is our mission, we publish all comments immediately. We simply request that you focus on the posted topic, and not attack anyone or use profanity. Please sign your post. Consistently used pseudonyms are acceptable, but "anonymous" is not. This site is a place for thoughtful conversation and a healthy exchange of ideas and perspective; rants and tirades don't further this mission and are not appropriate. We reserve the right to delete comments which do not follow these guidelines. Thank You!
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login