
I'm off to give a lecture at Pacific Union College for the Visual Arts department. I've titled it: Beyond Bored with Good and Evil: HBO's The Wire and the "Why?" Error of Christianity.
Here's a taste:
I've divided this argument into three parts. The first will center on the Platonic idea of diegesis. Second, I will look at how The Wire deploys diegetical tropes to tell about the city of Baltimore. Finally, I will examine how this cinema/television narrative device shifts the question of "why do bad things happen?" away from individuals or the supernatural. Instead this post-millennial town why-er draws our attention to the moral effects of human institutions. A theodicity.
In turning the city into the main character, through the personalities of institutions - the police, business, the drug trade, elected officialdom, family, the schools and the media - the narrative of The Wire connects to a telling question, if the city is the protagonist, what's the antagonist? Humanity?
Can a city tell a moral story? After 410 CE, Saint Augustine wrote the City of God. The full title is actually The City of God contra the Pagans. Written after the sacking of Rome, Augustine constructed a narrative of good vs. evil to answer the question of the Roman world. Why had their city, their institutions, their natio, their empire, failed?
Politicians cooking crime stats for higher office, school administrators teaching test questions to vindicate No Child Left Behind, sensitive prosecutions and investigations being undercut for political motives, brutal drug wars fought amid a police department's ignorance of and indifference to the forces involved -- wrong, but these persist.
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche tells us that "from every point of view the erroneousness of the world in which we believe we live is the surest and firmest thing we can get our eyes on". Philosophers are wrong to rail violently against the risk of being deceived. "It is no more than a moral prejudice that truth is worth more than appearance". This mediated simulacra is a place in which all truth lies.
And as a coda, I'd like to think with you about how we film and television artists/scholars can employ the tools of the medium to get beyond the broken media "why" error of good vs. evil. Instead, how do we Christians create an aesthetic past sheep or goats? In part, we can tell the truth that lies everywhere via a diegetic imagination.
Any fans for The Wire out there?
If you haven't watched the most critically acclaimed TV in history, you may not get some of what David Simon is talking about below. Nevertheless, I'd be curious to hear what people think of his pessimism about America and the near future of humanity.
Comments
Alex
It always has been the white hats against the black hats.
We either see the drama as a spectator sport or as participants.
The Seventh-day Adventist view is a mix of spectator/participant with the participant playing the dominate final role. Why not change the plot to a Passion Play in which the outcome is already known. All one has to do is join the winning side. Rather than a City of God which incidently produced the Vatican present: The Kingdom of Heaven is like....... In any case, the problem is one of narrative--how to tell the story in a compelling contemporary fashion--Good Luck. (Tom)
Thanks Tom.
In a part of the talk that I later cut, I note that the binary of the City of God vs. the City of Man created, like you intimate, an institution that opposed the reforms of humanism.
Erasmus was not the problem, as we know.
I think that institutions do many great things.
But what happens when we critique the binary of good vs. evil humans and instead talk about institutions?
But, doesn't this actually lie at the heart of Adventist version of the Great Controversy, an awareness that humans create institutions that can overtime tend toward trapping us in an illusion of human disconnectedness?
Yes Alex
But recent history, even within Adventism, demonstrates that men in power will "protect" the institution even if that institution was raised up to protest institutionalism. It goes, at least, as back as far as Abraham pleading with God: "Oh that Ishmael might live before thee!" Tom
Very true, that's why we must always, already keep vigilant and create safe spaces for critique and improvement.
Alex
I agree. Tom
Yes, huge fan of "The Wire" here...
It shows the futility of going against the system...yet it also shows why you can't just let the system crush you. Better to fight and be crushed for your values than to compromise. Maybe Daniels and Bunny paid for their principles with their careers, but they did accomplish some good; Daniels kept the Major Crimes Unit going as best he could, and Bunny was able to at least save Namond...
Geoff,
It's great to hear from a fellow fan. I agree with your summary of The Wire's almost sisyphean message.
I'm also haunted by Omar words to Bunk: a man has got to have a code.
It seems to me that an reflexively examined life or moral code formation - Omar taking his Grandmother to church - provides meaning in an otherwise nihilistic world.
I am reminded of a cartoon in the current New Yorker of a couple, with large grins, starting at their massive TV. On the screen is written: The Unexamined Life On Demand.
Post new comment