The Kite Runner: Is Redemption Truly Free?

image: 
thekiterunnerposter.jpg

What is the worst thing you have done to a friend or family member? Lied to them? Stolen from them? After the dreadful deed, did they forgive you? And, more importantly, did you forgive yourself? While I am sometimes nostalgic for lost friendships, I know that for various reasons, history, distance, and self-preservation, there are some friendships better left in the past. But with exceptional friendships, when two souls collide and recognize and accept the humanity in each other, I believe we should all make the effort to sustain that growth.

In the new movie, The Kite Runner, director Marc Forster poignantly portrays the main character’s release from guilt as he negotiates memories of his betrayal of his childhood friend. The scenes of innocent, yet precarious, friendship between two boys, Amir and Hassan (the son of Amir’s father’s servant), focus on what it means to be a true friend while mirroring the gritty conflict of Afghanistan’s volatile political and cultural history. The opening credits of Arabic-inspired calligraphy seem to represent the connection of all the characters in the story. This is a story of two boys in 1975, but also one that stretches the limits of culture and time to represent the most important of redemption stories.

Spoiler Alert
The movie begins with a phone call to the now-adult main character, Amir, played by British/Egyptian actor Khalid Abdalla, who has been hiding a shameful secret for over 25 years. The voice over the phone lines urges him that “There is a way to be good again.”

This leads me to question what it takes to be good again. When we sin, do we essentially become bad? Christians are taught that redemption is solely brought about through Christ’s sacrifice? Can it possibly be this simple? Is it possible that a symbolic act on Christ’s part can, in fact, save all of us from all our sins? If this is the case, why are we often unable to forgive ourselves? Why do we feel compelled to perform penance when we are told that our debt has been paid? Is there some action—work, not faith—required of us beyond believing in Christ’s gift of salvation? Do we, as human beings, have a debt to pay to fellow human beings (and animals) when we have wronged them? Can salvation truly be free, or, in order to believe that we deserve it, do we need to make retribution before being able to open ourselves to salvation? Is the act of salvation tied to the act of self-forgiveness? For Amir, achieving redemption requires more than faith in a Savior.

In The Kite Runner, despite the two main characters being from different cultural backgrounds (Pashtun and Hazara) that traditionally clash, the boys are raised together from birth, their fathers’ close relationship setting the stage for the boys’ relationship. Hassan (played by newcomer Ahmad Khan Mahmidzada) serves Amir (played by newcomer Zekeria Ebrahimi) cheerfully. He is the all-sacrificing Christ-figure, the one who, even in death, calls Amir to redemption. His character is an uncanny mix of innocence and strength. As a child, he is not petulant or resentful. As an adult, he reaches out to Amir even when one would expect the opposite.

Amir’s personal conflict stems from his perceived inability to please his father, Baba (played by Homayoun Ershadi). Amir tries to win approval by writing stories that his father never reads. To his father’s disappointment, Amir is a coward; he relies on Hassan to defend them from their bully, Assef. Amir’s only adult supporter is his father’s friend Rahim Khan, played by Shaun Toub, to whom Baba despairs that Amir will ever amount to much by saying, “A boy who won’t stand up for himself becomes a man who won’t stand up for anything.” Rahim Khan, however, sides with Amir and encourages him in his writing. He willingly plays the role of a mother figure in the young man’s life, encouraging, comforting, and balancing Baba’s harshness. He also acts as Amir’s conscience throughout the movie, urging him to confess, to make things right.
As a child, Amir finds that the only way to gain his father’s limited approval is to win the traditional kite-flying contest.

Hassan always knows exactly where a kite will drop once its string has been cut. He becomes Amir’s kite runner (hence the book and movie title), chasing down fallen kites as Amir works his way to winning the competition. As Amir cuts down the last opponent’s kite, Hassan, eyes shining, shouts a farewell, “For you, a thousand times over,” and triumphantly runs to collect the trophy that Hassan will carry home to gain his father’s approval. This is the last time we see Hassan smile.

Amir then commits the shocking act that requires redemption. He encounters his best friend being bullied, and ultimately raped by Assef, but does nothing to stop or even acknowledge this act. He simply hides, watching his friend’s assault, and then acts ignorant when Hassan limps to him with the kite. This act of cowardice so haunts Amir that just when we think that it cannot get worse and that Amir will confess or at least make up with Hassan, he further betrays his friend by forcing Hassan and his father out of their home. As Hassan and his father leave, Baba’s confusion and pain at the loss of the servant he grew up with do not prompt a last-minute confession from Amir. It seems as if he will truly have to live with his guilt as all chances of redemption pass by.

Amir and his father flee to the United States when the Russians invade Afghanistan. Amir graduates from community college and establishes a relationship with his father only when Baba is no longer a successful businessman and philanthropist. There is another opportunity for Amir to come clean when he asks a woman to marry him and she tells him of her less-than-exemplary reputation. This is the perfect time for Amir to also confess, but he simply clams up. The moment passes. As Baba grows weak and dies, Amir still does not confess.

And then he receives the phone call from Rahim Khan. The way for Amir “to be good again” is to return to Afghanistan. He learns that the Taliban have Hassan and his wife and Amir can redeem himself by rescuing Hassan’s son, Sohrab, from the Taliban leader Assef—the same man who bullied Hassan. Even Amir’s rescue seems to go wrong as Assef realizes who Amir is and refuses to allow Sohrab to leave. It is Sohrab who takes on the role of his father when he uses his father’s slingshot to shoot Assef in the eye, an act of vindication, although he does not know its significance.

Upon returning to the United States with Sohrab, Amir is unsure how to relate to this traumatized boy with silent eyes. While walking through the park several months later, he buys a kite and, while flying the kite for Sohrab, shouts, “For you, a thousand times over,” echoing Hassan’s greeting to Amir 25 years earlier. As Amir flies the kite, we are left with a view of Sohrab’s hesitant smile. Things are going to be right. Amir is good again. And with this release of guilt, Amir’s conscience is light enough to soar with the kites.

As a side note, the behind-the-scenes drama of The Kite Runner movie garnered attention with a story of its own. Amid possible reprisals and reaction in response to the rape scene, the movie’s release date was postponed so Paramount could secure the safety of the child stars. They were moved from Kabul to the United Arab Emirates, where the movie studio will continue to support them until they wish to return to their home country.



Watch the trailer for The Kite Runner

Maria Rankin-Brown has lived on several continents (Africa, Asia, North America) but now writes from Angwin, CA where she teaches English at Pacific Union College, including a Great Books class where The Kite Runner is taught.

Comments

Thanks for this review--I haven't seen this film yet, but it's on the list to see very, very soon. My book club read the book two years ago, and we all had a profound experience with the book. Every time I see the trailer with the line "There is a way to be good again," I get goose bumps.

There should be a spoiler alert somewhere at the start of this review.

It's there now David.

I don't understand how any Christian can claim to believe that you don't have to do anything beyond accepting that Jesus died to be saved. All Christians seem to think they have to work for redemption. No matter what denomination, people do things to assure their place in heaven. And they judge other people by what they see them doing (not what they see them believing). They go to church, they try to get others to go to church with them, they help their neighbors and they restrict what they eat, drink, listen to, etc., all in preparation for heaven. If they truly believed that Jesus Christ died for them, wouldn't they just sit back and wait for his return. What's with all the piety and good deeds? If Jesus really died for everyone and all it takes is to believe that, I'm more likely to get into heaven sitting on my couch doing nothing than those doing all the good works. I haven't seen the movie, but it seems like human beings can't accept that anything is free. And any religion comes with conditions. Even redemption has its price.

The grace of God gives us redemption for nothing in return. First comes the gift and than comes the acceptance of that gift. As a believer grows he realizes that there is a cost associated with the gift of redemption. The cost is not some kind of payment, but a desire to show gratitude, give thanks, and let others know about the grace of God. Christians who you see "doing good deeds and being all pious" are not trying to gain a box seat upstairs, but they are showing their thankfulness to the One who blessed them when they did not deserve it.
To be sure there are people who wrongly believe that their salvation depends on their actions, but they simply do not get it.We as people struggle with this idea of gracefully recieving things for free, so many feel the need to earn their way, though that is not neccesary with Jesus.
I accepted Christ long before I began to really praise him properly. There was a time in my walk where I was just not content with my thankfulness to Jesus, a time when I realized that sitting around on the couch was not what I wanted anymore, but what I really craved was active participation in His kingdom, by serving. I am now fairly active in service, not nearly as much as I would like, and I am sure that there are folks who think I am trying to earn favor...but thats not what I am doing, I am showing my gratitude!

The Christian messsage has changed drastically in the last century. For most of its history, Christianity inculculcated the fear of Hell into everyone, at a time when everyone was a Christian. Heresy was often a capital offense.

One only needs to read Jonathan Edwards' "Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God" to almost see and smell the burning flames of Hell he so vividly describes. Such a fear was so instilled into everyone that it kept them (insofar as possible) on the straight and narrow.

When did this sudden shift take place? Yes, there are scattered churches who still speak of Hell, but for the most part, it's about Heaven and eternal life, and even prosperity here and now.

The question becomes: are people good because God commands it and we wish to avoid Hell and go to Heaven? Or, is it possible to be good simply because it is the right thing to do? IOW, would you be just as good and kind if there were no rewards OR punishment? Morals don't come exclusively from God but are humans' response to their environment and the knowledge that goodness brings its own rewards. Would that be enough? If not, how does the belief in such futures affect your life differently today than it might be?

Some fear that hedonism would take over without a choice for the future, but where is the evidence?

I'm not saying that people are only good because the only other option is to be a hedonist. People are degrees of good and bad... which isn't what the Bible teaches (even a "small sin" is the same in God's eyes as a "big sin").I think people are good because they make a choice to be so and gain some intrinsic reward for that. But I see a danger in Christians doing good because they *think* it'll get them to heaven, and most of the Christians I know are like that. Instead of being *real* they go around acting like they're sunshiney happy all the day long because they think that's what God's redemption requires... Who wants to be around that all the time? Those of you who are Christians, how do you reconcile that you have bad days and want to do bad deeds even after accepting so-called redemption for free?

The life style of the forgiven is not to gain heaven but to gain converts to Christ. If we are His witnesses we need to be unempeachable witnesses. Tom

A story. Due to an Army misdirection, I underwent basic training three times. Once in the infantry and twice in the Medical Corp. Each trip included a "run through" the infiltration course.

In the barracks in the evening, I would study English Literature for a correspondence course and then study my SS lesson and have an evening prayer. I took a lot of heat and a few shoes.

Then one morning on the "Now Hear This Board" was a note that the next day would include the infiltration course.
That evening, my bunk was crowded with friends. One group wanted to know "How was it? etc. The other group were interested in going over the top with me. I asked why? They said, because God will look after you and we want to give Him the best opportunity to look after us too! I said, "That's fine with me, but I don't think it works that way. The next day the most nervous recruit marched as close to me as possible. We went over the top together and then
he froze. I completed the course but he kept calling my name so I crawled back under the wires to him and tried to get him to move. He wouldn't budge. I said, "Sorry, I have to leave, just hug the ground and you'll be alright. I can't stay here or they will think I froze also. So I went back through the course again. After that, I could read and pray in the evening without incident. I don't know if any souls were saved but no lives were lost. Tom

Post new comment

Because conversation is our mission, we publish all comments immediately. We simply request that you focus on the posted topic, and not attack anyone or use profanity. Please sign your post. Consistently used pseudonyms are acceptable, but "anonymous" is not. We reserve the right to delete comments which do not follow these guidelines. Thank You!
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

User login